|
KMID : 0358920050320030416
|
|
Journal of the Korean Academy of Pedodontics
2005 Volume.32 No. 3 p.416 ~ p.426
|
|
|
THE COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE SEDATIVE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT INTRAVENOUS MIDAZOLAM DOSAGES FOR PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS
|
|
Kim Eun-Young
Kim Jong-Soo
Yoo Seung-Hoon
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Intravenous sedation have many advantages of rapid onset and recovery, ability of control sedation levels and duration through titration. Midazolam is most commonly used intravenous medication for sedation in pediatrics, endoscopy, oncologic procedures and so on. But in dentistry, midazolam intravenous sedation is usually for adult, and there are few reports for children. Todays, children who need sedation become more and older, intravenous sedation technique is going a matter of concern in pediatric dentistry. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of sedation and clinical success for different initial dosage of midazolam in intravenous sedation for pediatric dental patients.
16 healthy children (male 10, female 6), mean age 54.7±10.7 months, who needed at least two separate treatment visits requiring local anesthesia were chosen for this study. Every children were taken 0.3mg/kg, maximum 5mg of midazolam by intramuscular route, and then 30~50% N₂O-O₂ for 10 minutes was given. On every visits, one of the following 2 different initial dosage was given by intravenous route : (1) Group Ⅰ : 0.1mg/kg Midazolam (2) Group Ⅱ : 0.2mg/kg Midazolam. Additional dosage was half of the first dose.
Physiologic parameters (oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure) was recorded by ten procedure steps. Behavior was videotaped and rated using Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale and Automated Counting System by one investigator, blind to administered dosage. After the treatment, operator evaluated the clinical success.
Physiologic parameters were stable and within normal range during treatment in both groups. The analyzed sedative effect, in behavioral evaluation, ratio of favorable Quiet was higher in group Ⅱ, and clinical success rate of group Ⅱ was better than group Ⅰ. Induction time was rapid in group Ⅱ, and recovery time was rapid in group Ⅰ. And there was no statistically difference between two groups in every results.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Intravenous administration, Midazolam, Sedation
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|